AMD Ryzen or Intel Celeron NAS Devices? Compared by Specs
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links on this page are affiliate links.
This guide compares the AMD Ryzen vs intel celeron NAS device options for your storage needs. You are choosing between the Synology DS925+ and the QNAP TS-264. Both units feature dual 2.5GbE ports for fast network connectivity. The main difference lies in their processor architecture and drive capacity. The Synology uses an AMD Ryzen chip with four bays, while the QNAP relies on an Intel Celeron quad-core processor with two bays. Each offers distinct advantages for different use cases.
Key differences
| Aspect | Synology 4-Bay AMD Ryzen NAS | QNAP TS-264 2-Bay Desktop NAS |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen V1500B | Intel Celeron Quad-core |
| Number of Bays | 4-Bay (up to 9-Bay) | 2-Bay |
| RAM Capacity | 4GB | 8GB |
| M.2 NVMe Slots | not listed | Dual PCIe Gen3x1 |
Which one should you choose?
Choose Synology 4-Bay AMD Ryzen NAS if
- You need more drive bays for high-capacity storage expansion
- You prefer the AMD Ryzen processor architecture
- You want a NAS that supports up to 9 bays with expansion
Choose QNAP TS-264 2-Bay Desktop NAS if
- You require more system RAM for virtualization or caching
- You want built-in M.2 NVMe SSD slots for cache acceleration
- You need dual USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports for fast external transfers
Verdict: Choose the Synology DS925+ if you need more drive bays and prefer the AMD Ryzen processor. Select the QNAP TS-264 if you want more RAM and built-in M.2 NVMe slots for caching. Both devices offer fast dual 2.5GbE networking for reliable file sharing.
Specs: AMD Ryzen vs Intel Celeron NAS
Processor architecture
The Synology DS925+ uses an AMD Ryzen V1500B processor. This chip is designed for robust performance in multi-threaded tasks. The QNAP TS-264 relies on an Intel Celeron Quad-core processor, specifically the N5105 or N5095 model. It features four cores and four threads with a burst speed up to 2.9 GHz. Both processors handle basic NAS duties well. The AMD Ryzen option targets slightly heavier workloads, while the Intel Celeron focuses on efficient burst speeds for everyday file management and media streaming.
RAM capacity
Memory is critical for running multiple services simultaneously. The Synology DS925+ comes with 4GB of RAM installed. This is sufficient for light virtualization and basic file sharing. The QNAP TS-264 offers a significant advantage here with 8GB of DDR4 RAM. This double amount allows for smoother multitasking and better performance when running Docker containers or multiple virtual machines. If you plan to use your NAS for more than just file storage, the extra memory in the QNAP unit provides a clear buffer for future expansion.
Number of bays
Storage expansion potential differs between these two units. The Synology DS925+ is a 4-Bay NAS, allowing you to install four hard drives directly. It can also expand to 9 bays using the DX525 expansion unit, supporting up to 180 TB of total storage. The QNAP TS-264 is a 2-Bay desktop NAS. It holds only two drives natively. While it offers M.2 NVMe slots for SSD caching or storage pools, it lacks the native drive bays for high-capacity HDD storage. For pure bulk storage capacity, the Synology unit is superior.
Hardware interface
Both devices offer modern connectivity options, but in different ways. The Synology DS925+ focuses on network throughput with dual 2.5GbE ports. It does not list internal SSD bays in its key specs. The QNAP TS-264 includes dual M.2 PCIe Gen3x1 NVMe SSD slots. These slots allow you to install fast SSDs for cache acceleration or dedicated storage pools. This hardware interface provides a significant performance boost for read/write operations. If you need fast access to frequently used files, the NVMe support on the QNAP unit is a practical advantage.
Network connectivity
Both NAS devices feature dual 2.5GbE ports for networking. This specification ensures fast data transfers across your local network for both units. The Synology DS925+ lists this connectivity as a key feature for stable data transfers. The QNAP TS-264 also highlights these ports for accelerating file sharing and large transfers. Since both products offer identical network hardware specifications, neither has a technical edge in raw network speed or redundancy options based on the provided data. You can expect similar performance from both in terms of LAN throughput.
Expandability options
How you expand storage matters for long-term use. The Synology DS925+ supports expansion via the DX525 unit, adding five more bays. This allows for a total of nine bays. The QNAP TS-264 uses a different approach. It includes one PCIe Gen3 x2 expansion slot for network cards or QM2 cards. It also has M.2 slots for SSDs. The Synology path offers more traditional hard drive bays for massive capacity. The QNAP path offers more flexibility for adding specialized hardware or fast SSD storage. The choice depends on whether you need more HDD slots or more hardware flexibility.
Which NAS Device Fits Your Needs
Users needing high capacity expansion
The Synology DS925+ supports up to 9 bays via the DX525, allowing storage expansion up to 180 TB. Its AMD Ryzen V1500B processor handles heavy multi-threaded tasks efficiently. You get 4GB of RAM and dual 2.5GbE ports for reliable data transfers and network redundancy.
Users prioritizing cache acceleration speed
The QNAP TS-264 includes dual M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD slots for cache acceleration or storage pools. It features an Intel Celeron Quad-core processor with 8GB DDR4 RAM. Dual 2.5GbE ports and USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports ensure fast file sharing and large media transfers.
Users wanting hardware expansion options
The QNAP TS-264 offers a PCIe Gen3 x2 expansion slot for network cards or QM2 cards. It provides 8GB of RAM and dual 2.5GbE connectivity. The Intel Celeron processor supports burst speeds up to 2.9 GHz, making it suitable for demanding desktop NAS workloads.
Quick picks
| # | Product | Best for | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synology 4-Bay AMD Ryzen NAS | Users needing high speed and expandable storage | Check price of Synology 4-Bay AMD Ryzen NAS on Amazon |
| 2 | QNAP TS-264 2-Bay Desktop NAS | Small teams needing fast network transfers | Check price of QNAP TS-264 2-Bay Desktop NAS on Amazon |
The products compared
Synology 4-Bay AMD Ryzen NAS
Best for: Users needing high speed and expandable storage
- Processor
- AMD Ryzen (what this guide is about)
- Drive Bays
- 4-Bay (up to 9-Bay)
- Network Connectivity
- 2x 2.5GbE
- RAM Capacity
- 4GB
- Dimensions
- 11.4 × 10.2 × 9.45 inches
- Weight
- 4.98 pounds
View on Amazon: Synology 4-Bay AMD Ryzen NAS Affiliate link
The Synology DS925+ is a 4-bay NAS featuring an AMD Ryzen V1500B processor and 4GB of RAM. It offers dual 2.5GbE ports for fast networking and supports expansion to 9 bays. You get up to 565 MB/s read speeds. This unit suits users needing robust performance and expandability for virtualization or surveillance tasks within a compact footprint.
Pros
- AMD Ryzen V1500B processor for dependable performance
- Dual 2.5GbE ports for fast and flexible networking
- Expandable to 9 bays with the DX525
- Up to 565 MB/s sequential read throughput
Cons
- Only 4GB of RAM limits heavy multitasking
- Requires Synology branded drives for full speed
- Standard 3-year warranty is shorter than some competitors
Good fit if
- You need high throughput for large file transfers
- You want to expand storage beyond 4 bays
- You require dual network interfaces for redundancy
Skip if
- You only need a basic 2-bay setup
- You prefer Intel Celeron processors for lower power
- You need more than 4GB of RAM pre-installed
Verdict: Synology DS925+ 4-Bay NAS provides strong Ryzen performance and dual 2.5GbE ports for users who need expandable storage and fast data transfers. It fits those prioritizing speed and flexibility over basic entry-level needs.
QNAP TS-264 2-Bay Desktop NAS
Best for: Small teams needing fast network transfers
- Processor
- Intel Celeron (what this guide is about)
- Drive Bays
- 2 Bay
- Network Connectivity
- Dual 2.5GbE
- RAM Capacity
- 8GB DDR4
- M.2 NVMe Slots
- Dual M.2 PCIe Gen3x1
- Included Storage
- Diskless
View on Amazon: QNAP TS-264 2-Bay Desktop NAS Affiliate link
The QNAP TS-264 is a 2-bay desktop NAS powered by a quad-core Intel Celeron N5105 processor. It includes 8GB of DDR4 RAM and dual 2.5GbE ports for faster network transfers. You get two M.2 NVMe slots for cache or storage and USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports for external drives. This setup suits users needing solid performance for media and file sharing without the cost of higher-end CPUs.
Pros
- Quad-core Intel Celeron N5105/N5095 processor
- 8GB DDR4 RAM for smooth multitasking
- Dual M.2 PCIe Gen3x1 NVMe slots
- Dual 2.5GbE network ports
- USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports with 10Gb/s speeds
Cons
- Only 2 drive bays limit total capacity
- Single PCIe expansion slot restricts add-on cards
- No mention of built-in display or remote control
Good fit if
- You need fast 2.5GbE network speeds
- You want NVMe cache acceleration
- You prefer 8GB RAM for better performance
Skip if
- You require more than 2 drive bays
- You need multiple PCIe expansion slots
- You prefer AMD Ryzen processors
Verdict: QNAP TS-264 2-Bay Celeron NAS offers strong specs for small teams. It fits users who value RAM and network speed over drive capacity.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Synology 4-Bay AMD Ryzen NAS | QNAP TS-264 2-Bay Desktop NAS |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Bays | 4-Bay (up to 9-Bay) | 2 Bay |
| Network Connectivity | 2x 2.5GbE | Dual 2.5GbE |
| Processor | AMD Ryzen V1500B | Intel Celeron N5105/N5095 |
| RAM Capacity | 4GB | 8GB DDR4 |
| M.2 NVMe Slots | not stated | Dual M.2 PCIe Gen3x1 |
| Included Storage | not stated | Diskless |
| Form Factor | not stated | Desktop |
| Hardware Interface | not stated | M.2 NVMe |
| Number of Bays | 4-Bay | 2-Bay |
| Processor Cores | not stated | Quad-Core |
| Dimensions | 11.4 × 10.2 × 9.45 inches | 13 × 9 × 11 inches |
| Weight | 4.98 pounds | 5.11 pounds |
| Size | 29 cm x 26 cm x 25 cm | 2 Bay (Unav.) |
| Color | black | Clear |
| Model | DS925+ | TS-264-8G-US |
Frequently asked questions
Which NAS offers better expandability for large storage needs?
The Synology DS925+ provides superior expansion capabilities. It supports up to 9 bays via the DX525 expansion unit. This configuration allows for storage capacity reaching 180 TB. The QNAP TS-264 is a 2-Bay desktop unit with limited physical drive slots. You should choose the Synology if you require significant room for future drive additions.
How does RAM capacity differ between these two models?
The Synology DS925+ includes 4GB of RAM. This memory supports robust performance for multi-threaded tasks. The QNAP TS-264 features higher RAM capacity, which benefits small teams needing fast network transfers. You should consider the Synology for heavy processing and the QNAP for network speed optimization over raw drive capacity.
Do both devices support fast network connectivity?
Yes, both units feature dual 2.5GbE ports. This specification ensures fast data transfers for your network. The Synology DS925+ uses this for high-speed performance. The QNAP TS-264 also includes 5GbE connectivity alongside its 2.5GbE ports. You get reliable, rapid network access regardless of your choice between these two specific models.
Which processor handles multi-threaded tasks more efficiently?
The Synology DS925+ uses an AMD Ryzen V1500B processor. This chip is designed for robust performance in multi-threaded tasks. The QNAP TS-264 relies on an Intel Celeron Quad-core processor, specifically the N5105 or N5095 model. You will find the Ryzen architecture better suited for heavy, concurrent processing workloads compared to the Celeron.
What is the physical size difference between these NAS devices?
The Synology DS925+ measures 10.2 inches wide, 9.45 inches high, and 11.4 inches long. It weighs 4.98 pounds. The QNAP TS-264 is slightly wider at 9 inches, taller at 11 inches, and deeper at 13 inches. It weighs 5.11 pounds. You should check your available space, as the QNAP has a larger footprint despite being a 2-Bay unit.
Can I add M.2 NVMe drives to the QNAP model?
Yes, the QNAP TS-264 supports M.2 NVMe hardware interfaces. This allows you to use fast solid-state drives for caching or storage. The Synology DS925+ data does not explicitly list M.2 NVMe support in the provided attributes. You should choose the QNAP if M.2 NVMe compatibility is a specific requirement for your setup.